![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| About Us | | | | | Infrastructure | | | | | Education | | | Commercial | | | Links | | | Sitemap | | | Contact | ||
|
MARKETING
Judicious
marketing is critical. And in the case of cement versus steel as in
India, it is crucial to appreciate the different approaches of the
public sector steel industry and the private sector cement industry. From the 1950s until about 2000, aside from Tisco in the private sector the predominant steel producer was the Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL). The Indian Iron and Steel Company (IISCo) was not functioning not only due to political activities but also because of a lack of investment, and it has since been subsumed by SAIL. There
was no incentive for the public sector to participate in marketing
because it was a captive market. Even today, the Indian steel industry
is indifferent to the introduction of modern design documents and
surface treatment principles, making it uncompetitive with its rival
sector. The
cement industry, on the other hand, flooded the country with reprints of
American Concrete Institute (ACI) technical documents from the 1950s and
kept abreast of technological developments overseas. Thus, by the 1970s,
while the steel industry floundered cement went from strength to
strength. Now,
thanks to competition from China, the Indian steel industry is on the
mend. But due to the conditions over the last 50 years, it will still
take some effort to convince architects and engineers of the benefits of
steel. |
|
|